For decades there was only 1 efficient option to keep data on a computer – working with a hard drive (HDD). Then again, this sort of technology is currently demonstrating it’s age – hard drives are actually loud and sluggish; they can be power–ravenous and frequently create a great deal of warmth during intense procedures.

SSD drives, on the contrary, are really fast, consume far less energy and they are far less hot. They provide an exciting new solution to file accessibility and storage and are years ahead of HDDs in relation to file read/write speed, I/O operation and also energy effectivity. See how HDDs stand up against the newer SSD drives.

1. Access Time

Image

Due to a revolutionary new method of disk drive general performance, SSD drives permit for noticeably faster file access speeds. With an SSD, data accessibility times are much lower (just 0.1 millisecond).

Image

HDD drives still work with the very same basic data access concept that’s initially developed in the 1950s. Though it has been much upgraded ever since, it’s sluggish when compared with what SSDs will provide. HDD drives’ file access rate ranges somewhere between 5 and 8 milliseconds.

2. Random I/O Performance

Image

The random I/O performance is really important for the overall performance of a data file storage device. We have executed substantial exams and have confirmed an SSD can manage a minimum of 6000 IO’s per second.

Image

With a HDD drive, the I/O performance steadily raises the more you employ the disk drive. Nevertheless, once it actually reaches a certain cap, it can’t go faster. And due to the now–old concept, that I/O limitation is significantly below what you can receive with an SSD.

HDD can only go as much as 400 IO’s per second.

3. Reliability

Image

The absence of moving elements and rotating disks in SSD drives, and also the recent improvements in electric interface technology have generated a significantly better file storage device, having a common failing rate of 0.5%.

Image

With an HDD drive to work, it has to rotate a couple metallic hard disks at more than 7200 rpm, holding them magnetically stabilized in mid–air. They have a massive amount of moving components, motors, magnets along with other devices jammed in a small space. Therefore it’s obvious why the average rate of failing of any HDD drive ranges between 2% and 5%.

4. Energy Conservation

Image

SSDs do not have moving elements and need not much chilling power. Additionally they call for not much energy to perform – lab tests have demonstrated they can be operated by a regular AA battery.

As a whole, SSDs use up somewhere between 2 and 5 watts.

Image

HDD drives can be well known for getting noisy; they are more likely to overheating and if you have several disk drives in a single server, you will need an extra cooling unit just for them.

All together, HDDs take in between 6 and 15 watts.

5. CPU Power

Image

Thanks to SSD drives’ better I/O efficiency, the main server CPU can work with file demands much faster and save time for other operations.

The average I/O delay for SSD drives is 1%.

Image

HDD drives permit slower access speeds in comparison to SSDs do, which will result for the CPU required to delay, although scheduling resources for your HDD to discover and return the demanded data file.

The regular I/O wait for HDD drives is about 7%.

6.Input/Output Request Times

Image

In real life, SSDs conduct as admirably as they have during our trials. We competed a complete system back–up using one of our own production servers. Throughout the backup operation, the standard service time for any I/O demands was below 20 ms.

Image

In comparison to SSD drives, HDDs feature considerably slower service rates for I/O calls. Throughout a server backup, the common service time for an I/O query ranges somewhere between 400 and 500 ms.

7. Backup Rates

Image

You’ll be able to feel the real–world potential benefits to having SSD drives on a regular basis. By way of example, on a hosting server pre–loaded with SSD drives, a full data backup is going to take merely 6 hours.

Image

On the other hand, with a web server with HDD drives, a comparable backup may take three to four times as long to complete. A full backup of any HDD–equipped hosting server usually takes 20 to 24 hours.

Should you wish to promptly raise the performance of your respective websites and never have to transform any kind of code, an SSD–driven web hosting solution is a really good option. Take a look at Eurabiahosting’s cloud hosting packages and additionally our VPS servers – these hosting services offer really fast SSD drives and are offered at inexpensive price points.

  • Service guarantees

  •  
  • Join us now. There won’t be any configuration charges you’ll also find complete root access to your server. 99.9% network uptime is guaranteed.

  • Compare our prices

  •  
  • Find out more about our pricing and pick the perfect Virtual Private Server for your powerful sites. You can upgrade to a more advanced VPS Hosting package with only a click.
  • Compare our hosting plans

  • Contact Us

  •  
  • Our representatives are online for you 7 days a week to reply to any kind of inquiries with regards to our VPS Hosting services. 1–hour reply time frame warranty.